What is your default setting in SD-B for Backflush at Enter Finished Production?

Lynn,
     We have been watching closely for the work order issue problems since we are trying to get to the bottom of the problem and put a fix in place.  On a work order finished goods close from 11/1/02, we find that the material issues all appear in the INVTXN  table but are no where to  be found in the WOMAT table.  In this case the entire set of BOM backflush transactions are missing from WOMAT.
     I thought this info might be heipful in thinking about the problem.

Did the person doing WO-I have any errors?  I have tested and have not seen a problem with the WOMAT records being generated.

Lynn,  
      In looking into this further I find that a particular work order that had no WOMAT transaction for any of about 12 different date finished good closes has a BOM that has the same component part number on the BOM more than once. That is the item is on the BOM twice.  This is fairly common in our BOM's because certain components are placed at two different points in our process.  
     Could the double entry on the BOM lead to the problem ?

We continue to see the failure to post data to the WOMAT file.   Your thoughts on cause and fix ?

This sounds like a legitimate bug.  Anyway it can be traced to a particular update so that we can be careful not to apply it?
 
I don't see why it would be and Evo/Classic issue as my understanding is the underlying code hasn't changed.

Lynn, she was in WO-G and it was a straight-forward issue of 5 additional of a part already issued to 100%, and no scrap issue was involved.  
We are on version 2004.1, 10/08/04 update. By the way,  my "about" button in Evo Help doesn't do anything!

The problem is the WO-A Materials screen does not reflect the issue total of ten(200%) it only shows the first issue, 5(100%).  The two issues were done on different dates and we can see them  everywhere but here.  As I said previously, we use this screen quite a bit to check materials issued to a particular work order instead of going to JC-E Material Issues.  But if it is not accurate.....

Rebuilding the work order did nothing, and now I have another one-- This time as before, all the transaction reports are correct, and are properly reflected in the GL, but the work order WO-A Materials screen is wrong, and this time the work order job cost report JC-A in detail is wrong also.  
 
User defined Inv trans- IN-O:
1400065         10/19/04 I WO ISSUE         8.00   4474-  2        17.6700 KVICHAK MARINE INDUSTRIES                     01:59:31 p10/19/04
1400065         11/02/04 I WO ISSUE        -8.00   4474-  2        17.6700 KVICHAK MARINE INDUSTRIES      PMOREY         10:44:53 A11/02/04
1400065         11/30/04 I WO ISSUE         8.00   4474-  2        17.6700 KVICHAK MARINE INDUSTRIES      SHERRY         01:08:06 P11/30/04
 
JC-E material issues:
 Date    Work Order S  Parent Part      Part Number     Description                       Qty Issued      Scrapped SC         Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
10/19/04    4474-  2 C  9300042          1400065         VALVE,PRV,MRD,2.3-2.5                   8.0000        0.00          141.36
11/02/04    4474-  2 C  9300042          1400065         VALVE,PRV,MRD,2.3-2.5                  -8.0000        0.00         -141.36
11/30/04    4474-  2 C  9300042          1400065         VALVE,PRV,MRD,2.3-2.5                   8.0000        0.00          141.36
 
Job cost report JC-A for this line item:
1400065          0    0.000000    141.360000          0.00      -141.36    0.00
VALVE,PRV,MRD,2.3-2.5
 
WO-A Materials screen: reflects the same data as job cost with -8 issued.
I have tried changing status from closed to Released to recalculate also, but nothing changes.  There is faulty data somewhere, but where, and why?

Not the case here, this is an R type issued using WO-G to a F type.