Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
09/05/10 at 04:28:59
News:
Home Help Search Login Register


Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
WIP for Indirect WOs (Read 97 times)
GasGiant
Administrator
*****


It appeared to be
the logical choice
at the time.

Posts: 1293
Gender: male
WIP for Indirect WOs
07/20/10 at 05:25:55
 
The fact that items issued (WO-G) to Indirect Work Orders show up in WIP, JC-P and in IN-A, is becoming an accounting issue for us. My understanding is that the items have gone through all of the accounting steps and are properly expensed, according to the class of the parent, and should not be counted as inventory on hand. We are able to exclude these items from reports but must repeatedly explain to financial auditors why some of our WIP is not WIP  embarrassed
 
Any chance of getting this changed? Or is there some reason that this needs to be?
Back to top
 
 

Colin Michael
Senior ERP Analyst
Evo~ERP 2010 (SP2), 28 User,
P.SQL 2000i on Win2k, 30 User
Silver Support
Email WWW GasGiant GasGiant 31012781 swordworlder swordworlder   IP Logged
Kelloggs
Senior Member
****


Do crazy people know
they are crazy?

Posts: 353
Gender: male
Re: WIP for Indirect WOs
Reply #1 - 07/20/10 at 13:01:59
 
On the JC-P why  are you printing Indirect Work Orders?  
 
???
 
Kelloggs
Back to top
 
 

Programming is like sex:
One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life.
Email WWW Kelloggs   IP Logged
Lynn_Pantic
Administrator
*****


evolution (n) -
gradual change to a
different form

Posts: 4417
Re: WIP for Indirect WOs
Reply #2 - 07/20/10 at 13:30:44
 
John is correct, JC-P defaults to only status R & F so the Indirect Work Orders would be excluded unless you explicitly changed to include them.
Back to top
 
 

Lynn Pantic
IS Tech Support
lynn@istechsupport.com
Email   IP Logged
GasGiant
Administrator
*****


It appeared to be
the logical choice
at the time.

Posts: 1293
Gender: male
Re: WIP for Indirect WOs
Reply #3 - 07/21/10 at 04:48:52
 
Was my question not clear? Is there an answer? Or is attempting to hide this anomaly from our auditors the best answer we can come up with?
Back to top
 
 

Colin Michael
Senior ERP Analyst
Evo~ERP 2010 (SP2), 28 User,
P.SQL 2000i on Win2k, 30 User
Silver Support
Email WWW GasGiant GasGiant 31012781 swordworlder swordworlder   IP Logged
Lynn_Pantic
Administrator
*****


evolution (n) -
gradual change to a
different form

Posts: 4417
Re: WIP for Indirect WOs
Reply #4 - 07/21/10 at 06:26:12
 
I can look into a change to IN-A to suppress indirect work orders from the "In WIP" display but as far as reports go, you can already do it and I would think the auditors are more likely to be looking at reports.
Back to top
 
 

Lynn Pantic
IS Tech Support
lynn@istechsupport.com
Email   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print