We are on GL-B 3/8/16.  Holly is reporting that when she adds a transaction in one company in GL-B, it says it will be based on one number, like 14065, but then the actual transaction # getting assigned is something like 2994.  Sequentially, this would be a number back from around 2005-2006.  Why is this suddenly occurring, what would trigger this?  It seems to be find in our other company, the transaction # being assigned is tracking in order.
 
Help!  Finance is concerned since they will have to close the month, we are under audit, and the auditors may take issue with these out of sequence transaction numbers.
 
I had Holly try in both our companies, and also the same in the test companies, and it seems to be an issue with only one company, whether live or test.
Nothing that we can see in defaults triggers this, nor to our knowledge has any defaults been actually changed in quite some time.
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Val

Thank you!  
 
we'll give that a shot!  Lynn also emailed to tell us to use SD-R to fix.  
Of course, accounting is wondering how it got messed up. I've learned there is never an answer for stuff like this... It's fine one day, the next...who knows why....
 
Val

Thanks, Dave. I have printed this thread for our accounting manager, maybe this will be helpful to her when troubleshooting if it happens again!  It's entirely possible, I know I have heard sales sometimes have a sales order or a quote where copying hung up things, esp. the original they were copying from....
 
Val