Welcome, Guest. Please Login.
05/11/25 at 16:46:46
News:
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Vendor Performance Report (Read 532 times)
Lynn_Pantic
Administrator
*****


evolution (n) -
gradual change to a
different form

Posts: 5663
Vendor Performance Report
07/07/03 at 18:44:59
 
I have had several requests for a Vendor Delivery Performance Report and am looking for feedback regarding how to quantify it.  It is easy enough to define due date versus actual receipt date and therefore number of days early or late.  Items to discuss include:
 
1.  Should an early receipt offset a late one when calculating vendor ratings/averages?
2.  How does a 1 day late receipt of 2 pieces of a $2 item compare to a 30 day late receipt of 1000 units at $100 each?  Is the dollar value or quantity of greater importance?  Or should the report offer multiple options to determine an aggregate vendor rating?  Obviously a late $0.10 item can potentially hold up a $100,000 shipment so maybe dollar value doesn't count.  Comments, please.
3.  PO Receipt (in DBA) doesn't truly happen until QC Buyoff if you receive to QC.  But I presume if the parts are good, the vendor delivery performance shouldn't suffer because your QC people are lazy.  
4.  Any other ideas/comments?
Back to top
 
 

Lynn Pantic
IS Tech Support
lynn@istechsupport.com
Email   IP Logged
melrath
Ex Member



Re: Vendor Performance Report
Reply #1 - 07/08/03 at 07:01:21
 
Lynn this sounds like a great idea!  8)
 
1. We operate within a 7 day on-time window. So if a vendor delivers 7 days early, or late, they're still considered on-time. Anything outside the window is considered unacceptable and counts against them.
 
2. Dollar value is not an issue in our calculations. We try to meet our promised delivery dates to our customers in order maintain our vendor rating. Also, we don't always know the value of our customer 's finished product.
 
3. We treat on-time performance (receipt date) and quality performance (buyoff date) as 2 separate issues. Of course, if it gets rejected it might affect delivery performance; but sometimes replacements are made within the delivery window. Therefore, the poor quality aspect has to be tracked separately.  
 
Hope this helps. Smiley
 
Fred
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Lynn_Pantic
Administrator
*****


evolution (n) -
gradual change to a
different form

Posts: 5663
Re: Vendor Performance Report
Reply #2 - 07/08/03 at 11:43:56
 
OK, how does this sound as a flexible approach (same logic could be used for On-Time rating of shipments to customers)
 
1.  Prompt for Date Range of receipts to be included in the calculation
2.  Define whether to base on Actual Receipt Date or Estimated Receipt Date within that range
3.  Define "On-Time Window" in terms of allowable days early and allowable days late.
4.  Enter range of Vendors to be rated based on From/Through Vendor Code and Vendor Class
5.  Select On-Time Rating method to be used as one or more of the following:
a.  Percent of receipts on-time based on number of PO Lines received on time regardless of quantity of items or dollar value of each received line divided by total number of lines received from the vendor.
b.  Percent of Items on-time based on total quantity of items received on time divided by total quantity of items received.
c.  Percent of value on-time based on total dollar value of items received on-time divided by total value of all items received from the vendor.
6.  Print out a report listing each vendor and the on-time rating percentage based on the method(s) selected.
 
 
Comments please.....
Back to top
 
 

Lynn Pantic
IS Tech Support
lynn@istechsupport.com
Email   IP Logged
aricon
Active Member
*****


Systems
Consulting-See
website for
products!

Posts: 1283
Gender: male
Re: Vendor Performance Report
Reply #3 - 07/08/03 at 12:33:40
 
Lynn,
 
We have already developed 75% of this in an Access application which could be brought to 100%, and maybe even more if the desire is out there, in a short time frame.  And in Access it is quite easy to "tag" out of sequence vendor codes to be included in the report.  Whereas in TAS it is NOT so easy.
 
This is available.  And should there be a strong expression of interest from forum members (or from Lynn on behalf) then we would certainly endeavor to complete the additional capabilities indicated in this thread that are not there currently developed product ASAP.
Back to top
 
 

Sincerely,

Lorne Rogers
President
Aria Consulting & Implementers Ltd.
Phone: (780) 471-1430
Fax: (780) 471-4918
E-mail: lrogers@ariaconsulting.net
Email WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print