Vman
Senior Member
If it ain't broke, don't fix it
Posts: 460
Gender:
|
We use average costs as well. I can understand why IN-C works that way now. It seems that many people use the standard costs functions (not fully, because if your costing method is average, then the only things in standard costs are materials and labor normally), is a) because you can't directly roll up average costs, and have to use the standard costs programs for things like recalculating COGS when you're doing things like new pricing and b) because it gives you a place to store what should be good costs data that can be used to compare with average and last to see if something is out of whack. The person who is doing our purchasing now used to work for a large company that did full-blown standard costing. As she described it to me, it was a very detailed process, including getting price increase projections from vendors, researching trends, recacluating labor rates, etc. As we are a small company, we can't devote the resources to do this. I do not profess to be anywhere near an expert at this, so maybe that's why I think the whole use standard cost to rollup your average costs is a little strange. On a somewhat off-topic note, how do some of you folks handle adjusting items into inventory that were free, such as samples. If you put them in at last or average cost, are you technically over-stating your inventory value? If you put them in a 0.01, you hose your average cost.
|